Debt Serfdom in One Chart
The essence of debt serfdom is debt rises to compensate for stagnant wages.Charles Hugh Smith
Friday, May 04, 2012
I often speak of debt serfdom; here it is, captured in a single chart. The basic dynamics are all here, if you read between the lines:
1. Financialization of the U.S. and global economies diverts income to
capital and those benefitting from globalization/ "financial
innovation;" income for the top 5% rises spectacularly in real terms
even as wages stagnate or decline for the bottom 80%.
2. Previously middle class households (or those who perceive themselves
as middle class) compensate for stagnating incomes and rising costs by
borrowing money: credit cards, auto loans, student loans, etc. In
effect, debt is substituted for income.
3. The dot-com/Internet boom boosted incomes across the board, enabling the bottom 95% to deleverage some of the debt.
4. When the investment/speculation bubble popped, incomes again
declined, and households borrowed heavily against their primary asset,
the home, via home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), second mortgages,
etc.
5. The incomes of the top 5% rose enough that these households could
actually reduce their debt (deleverage) even before the housing bubble
popped.
Here is a chart of real (inflation-adjusted) incomes, courtesy of
analyst Doug Short: note that the incomes of the bottom 80% have been
flatlined for decades, while the top 20% saw modest growth that vanished
once the housing bubble popped. Only the top 5% experienced significant
expansion of income. Notice that incomes of the top 20% and top 5%
really took off in 1982, once financialization became the dominant force
in the economy.
Interestingly, we can see the double-bubble (dot-com and housing)
clearly in the top income brackets, as these speculative bubbles boosted
capital gains and speculation-based income. Since the bottom 80% had
little capital to play with, the twin bubbles barely registered in their
incomes.
Bottom line: financialization and substituting debt for income have
run their course. They're not coming back, no matter how hard the
Federal Reserve pushes on the string.Both of these interwined trends have traced S-curves and are now in terminal decline:
Those hoping the economy is "recovering" on the backs of financial
speculation/ legerdemain and ramped up borrowing by the lower 95% will
be profoundly disappointed when reality trumps fantasy.
By PAN PYLAS 05/ 2/12